10 Unpopular Opinions About The Original Series, According To Reddit

Star Trek: The Original Series sparked a science fiction revolution in 1960s television and gave fans a hopeful glimpse into the future of mankind. Although quite a product of its time, TOS established a lasting legacy that would influence the star trek franchise for decades to come.

RELATED: The 20 Best Star Trek: The Original Series Episode To Rewatch

Despite its holy reputation, there are aspects of the show that fans have taken umbrage at and they aren’t afraid to voice their opinions. Reddit users have taken to the site to speak out and make known many of their most unpopular opinions on the classic show.


William Shatner is not up to the task

William Shatner Star Trek Captain Kirk Scared

One of the defining aspects of TOS was its dynamic cast, including its charismatic frontman in Captain James T. Kirk as portrayed by William Shatner. Although Kirk produced some of the toughest moments on the show, some think Shatner’s performance is suspect. User RP_Fan said of the actor, “William Shatner is a terrible actor and an embarrassment to the brand”.

Although large aspects of TOS are tacky by today’s standards, they were groundbreaking for their time. As for Shatner, his history as a television actor made him a perfect fit for the wordy character. Over time, Shatner settled into the role and showed character growth in the films, especially Khan’s anger.

Star Trek: The Original Series Hasn’t Aged Well

Spock's Brain

1960s television was more about story and less about dazzling sets and exciting special effects. Because of this, TOS is largely a product of the era it was made, and it’s best to look past its technical flaws. User N0-1_H3r3 couldn’t see past the flaws when they wrote “The original series is good for its time, but it hasn’t aged well”.

In many ways, if something is good for its time, it is also good for all time. As media ages, it will inevitably lag behind modern technological advancements and what remains are the positives. TOS was anchored by an important idea and clever concepts that still stand out today, even if the technical aspects have aged badly.

Star Trek is a Twilight Zone Scam

William Shatner in Star Trek and The Twilight Zone

Comparison can be a sincere form of flattery, but it can also be used as a point of derision when something is supposed to be inferior to the thing it is being compared to. The 1960s was a progressive and influential time in television and there were some similarities between the hit shows. A deleted user saw a comparison to be made between two 60s staples when he wrote “TOS was right blurred area in the space”.

Corn The twilight zone also produced many classic episodes, the two shows were also very different. Both shows were led by television visionaries, but they mostly strayed from their view of the world and the future of humanity. star trek was a utopian vision of the future when The twilight zone was a less than positive view of human nature through short morality stories.

Star Trek: Original Series Lows Aren’t That Low

Star Trek: Catspaw

The original series had some soaring moments and classic episodes, but it’s also widely believed that there were a fair number of duds as well. No show, no matter how beloved, is entirely perfect and many fans have chosen to ignore the less than stellar aspects of TOS. However, the user SingerOfSongs_ had a rosier take on the show when they wrote “The Bad Episodes of TOS aren’t even that bad, and are still very entertaining.”

RELATED: 5 Ways Wrath Of Khan Is The Best Star Trek Movie (& 5 Ways It’s The Uncharted Country)

star trek purists are generally opposed to some of the weirder episodes of TOS and prefer to focus on the many highlights. However, there are also a fair number of great moments to enjoy in the show’s cheesiest episodes. The “Catspaw” episode, for example, is an entertaining and spooky space adventure that essentially serves as a Halloween episode.

Most of Star Trek: The Original Series Canon Should Be Thrown Away

In a long-running franchise like star trek, it’s important to establish the rules of the universe to keep the stories consistent. When it comes to TOS, the classic series helped establish what the future of the franchise would look like. User I’m at work was not happy with TOS‘s canon by writing “At least 60% of TOS should be decanonized. Some concepts don’t make sense.”

While many sequel series have had to tackle updating the outdated look of TOS, the cannon bones are still strong. Although the sets, special effects and make-up technology are improving year by year, what is most important about star trek is his canon story. Eliminate large swathes of TOS would fundamentally destabilize this star trek was meant to be.

Star Trek: The Original Series Season 3 Is Good

Star Trek - Let This Be Your Last Battleground

Although he innovated, TOS didn’t have the best run when it first aired. Although fans rarely agree on most things, it’s almost universally agreed that the show’s third season was inferior to its predecessors. However, the user Middle AgesGeek had different ideas when they wrote “TOS season 3 is underrated.”

While there were some bright spots to be gleaned from the third season such as “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield”, the season also had many lows. Many episodes in the final season tended toward more cheesy aspects or were downright laughable, like the infamous episode “Spock’s Brain.”

Star Trek: The Original Series Has The Most Problematic Canon

Some fans lament the management of the canon when it comes to new series trying to co-opt the hiking universe. User weirbrain offered a different view of the sanctity of the canon when they wrote “TOS breaks the canon more than any other series, movie, time travel episode or alternate timeline since.”

Establishing the canon in the 1960s was not necessarily the most important goal of TOS. However, as the universe became more fleshed out, a closer eye was put on preserving the canon. Subsequently, many foreign novels, films, and media attempted to establish a more cohesive narrative.

Mudd is a bad Star Trek character

Roger C Carmel as Harry Mudd and William Shatner as James T Kirk in Star Trek

In its relatively short run on television, star trek established many memorable characters in the main cast as well as supporting roles. Harry Mudd was one of the few supporting characters to appear more than once, and he left an impression on fans. However, a deleted the user had a less positive view of the character, writing “Harry Mudd is a dull boring character”.

RELATED: The 20 Best Star Trek: The Next Generation Episodes Of All Time

The character is not meant to be likable, making it the perfect foil for standing Federation characters. However, it’s possible for an unlikable character to become so unlikable that fans don’t want to see them. While it may rub some viewers the wrong way, there’s no doubt that Harry Mudd’s importance in the TOS heritage.

“Tomorrow is yesterday” is awkward

Star Trek - Tomorrow is Yesterday

The episode “Tomorrow Is Yesterday” finds the Enterprise above modern Earth and a fighter pilot is taken aboard the ship. User Mutatrocity wrote this from the episode “My main reason for disliking TOS boils down to the episode ‘Tomorrow Is Yesterday’…that really obvious sci-fi concepts like time pollution are treated so awkwardly”.

The fact that Kirk doesn’t realize he’s polluting the timeline is obvious to modern viewers, but in the 1960s it was complicated. Although time travel is becoming an important part of hikingit was necessary to explain the idea of ​​temporal pollution to the viewer so that he could more easily understand it.

There’s too much love for Gene Roddenberry

Star Trek The Original Series Gene Roddenberry

Gene Roddenberry’s vision of a utopian future provided the impetus for star trek and he’s the only reason the franchise exists. However, the user FKRMunkiBoi would rather it be forgotten writing “I think Gene Roddenberry gets a lot more credit than he deserves compared to others who worked on Hiking”.

While many designers have embraced his ideas and raced with them, there’s no denying Roddenberry’s importance to the star trek universe. What makes it so important is its insistence on the original concepts of TOS. As the franchise evolved into films and later shows, Roddenberry insisted on consistency of themes.

NEXT: Star Trek’s Doctors, Ranked By Sympathy

lord of the rings the two towers aragorn the rings of power

Rings Of Power Sounds Like Jackson’s LOTR Trilogy (And That’s A Good Thing)

About the Author

Comments are closed.